Monday, May 21, 2012
Over The Limit 2012
Monday, April 30, 2012
Extreme Rules 2012
Monday, March 12, 2012
Be afraid, be very afraid!

I have been shaking my head baffled for the last half hour. Utterly confused at the over the top and ridiculous reaction to Bob Katter’s Australia Party advertisement on gay marriage. To view the advertisement, go to this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wY8N2xSU3c0
I have watched it at least half a dozen times by the time I write this, each time trying to find the outrageous and homophobic slurs this advertisement contains. Did I find any?
I think I did. At one point it says: “Do you really think he [Campbell Newman] will stand up to minority groups?” in front of a picture of two gay men before stating: “That’s right, he supports gay marriage!” Thus, I can imagine that minority groups (not just homosexual couples) could feel affronted that they need standing up to. Even more affronting, it’s by a well known crazy politician that could be labelled a red neck and is often ridiculed for his unusual antics. In fact, the more I look at it the more concerned I am.
[It is ironic that Katter wants to stand up to minorities when his opinion on gay marriage has been proven to be a minority one. Does that mean he will need to stand up to himself? If anyone could do it, I’m sure Bob could.]
Also, the image they use could be offensive. Yes, an image of two gay men, one clearly older than the other. Does this not represent homosexual couples? Is it offensive because it only shows men? Is that pixilation of the image some sort of hidden message about the abhorrent nature of their relationship? Are all gay couples like this? Who knows? But the fact that I have to read so much into the image with no words or voice over condemning them (NB: the worst the advertisement implies is that is threatens family values – see Julia Gillard’s statements below on that issue) makes me wonder is it really that scary?
Indeed, the fact that Katter will be lucky to get 10% of the vote and even hold the balance of power makes this whole debate even scarier. He is a fringe politician with a small niche constituency that the advertisement clearly plays to. Does it mean he dislikes gay marriage? Clearly it does. Does it mean he should be harangued by media and receive hate mail? I think not.
Let us remember back to what Julia Gillard had to say on the issue:
“I think that there are some important things from our past that need to continue to be part of our present and part of our future. If I was in a different walk of life, if I'd continued in the law and was partner of a law firm now, I would express the same view, that I think for our culture, for our heritage, the Marriage Act and marriage being between a man and a woman has a special status.
Now, I know people might look at me and think that's something that they wouldn't necessarily expect me to say, but that is what I believe.
I'm on the record as saying things like I think it's important for people to understand their Bible stories, not because I'm an advocate of religion - clearly, I'm not - but once again, what comes from the Bible has formed such an important part of our culture." (Downloaded from http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/pm-julia-gillard-gay-marriage-against-my-upbringing/story-e6freuy9-1226025009815 on March 12, 2012)
So our PM feels that gay marriage shouldn’t be legal because “I think for our culture, for our heritage, the Marriage Act and marriage being between a man and a woman has a special status.” The same PM who stated that:
“The Greens will never embrace Labor's delight at sharing the values of everyday Australians, in our cities, suburbs, towns and bush, who day after day do the right thing, leading purposeful and dignified lives, driven by love of family and nation” (Downloaded from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/greens-dont-share-aussie-values-pm/story-fn7x8me2-1226031649495 on March 12, 2012)
Thus she too is against gay marriage and implies that Greens policies, like gay marriage, are against “the values of everyday Australians”. Yet do we have this level of vitriol and hatred directed against her despite the fact that she refuses to support the gay marriage bill if it was presented to the parliament. That’s right, a big fat no.
Do I agree with gay marriage? Yes, I do. Do I agree with Bob Katter opposing gay marriage? No, I don’t. But the point is that Bob Katter has a right to have a policy that opposes gay marriage. The fact is that in a democracy some people will disagree with you but this is ultimately a good thing. Katter has raised the issue of gay marriage and there should be a genuine debate on the issue. That means listening to all sides of the argument, even those who oppose gay marriage, without resorting to over the top denunciations. Sarah Hanson-Young has clearly been taking populist political lessons from Tony Abbott with her ridiculous claims that the advertisement should be pulled off the air.
So I am quite scared but not about Bob Katter’s advertisement. I’m scared about people who are afraid of a democracy in which people can hold minority opinions.Friday, March 2, 2012
Elimination Chamber & Wrestlemania Musings

Due to my laziness in not posting soon as Elimination Chamber finished, here is a briefer summary of Elimination Chamber and some thoughts on Wrestlemania 28.
Elimination Chamber 2012
World Heavyweight Champion Daniel Bryan won the SmackDown Elimination Chamber Match
This was the less entertaining of the two elimination chamber matches but with people such as Big Show and The Great Khali involved this really wasn’t a surprise. Khali’s involvement was mercifully short but provoked the question: why include him in the first place for 30 seconds of in-ring action? Big Show climbing into Bryan’s pod was interesting and made sense with their recent feud. The only excitement came when it looked like Santino might win the match with a cobra but Bryan thankfully made him tap out. Overall, some good spots with a nice win for Bryan.
WWE Champion CM Punk won the Raw Elimination Chamber Match
This was the first match of the night and started off nicely with Punk and Kofi going at it. This was much faster than the SmackDown match and thus far more interesting. Jericho dominated before being concussed by Punk while Punk defeated Miz to retain the title. For all the apparent heat Miz is receiving he performed well and showed why he deserves to be in the main event. While WWE argue that they are keeping Jericho from losing to Punk, the end was lame and clearly looked like a work.
John Cena def. Kane (Ambulance Match)
For two generally boring wrestlers this was an entertaining match. The two went at it over the arena with an AA off the top of the ambulance to end the match for Cena. It ends the Cena/Kane feud with Cena not embracing the hate but by this point did anyone really care?
United States Champion Jack Swagger def. Justin Gabriel
Missed this match as I was getting a drink and it seems it wasn’t much to write about anyway.
Divas Champion Beth Phoenix def. Tamina Snuka
Tamina needs to develop some more moves apart from the superfly splash. The fact that she went for it every third move indicated clearly she wasn’t going to win and when Beth kicked out it made it look weak. Beth is an awesome champion but WWE needs to seriously build the women’s division or just get rid of it.
Wrestlemania 28
As the year’s biggest event rolls round it seems WWE is trying its best to build excitement for Rock/Cena and Taker/HHH. Unfortunately, as a member of the IWC recently stated, the Cena/Rock feud has been going for a year and the most fighting has occurred on Twitter. That’s right; the most interesting reason they have to fight is that they troll each other on a social networking site! This sounded lame when Rock interfered at WM last year and isn’t getting any better. The match itself should be good because the Rock will lift Cena to new heights but I wish the WWE would stop trying to make the reason behind it seem important when it clearly isn’t.
Similar things could be said about HHH/Taker. Firstly, Taker doesn’t appear for one year and decides to challenge HHH at WM28. Surprising? No but then again everyone knew Taker would have a match in Florida. Secondly, HHH can’t stay away from the spotlight. He claims he wants to build up other talent but then makes his match the co-main event at WM28 thus relegating the championship matches to mere afterthoughts. The Hell in a Cell stipulation will make a fitting end to both their careers and will be a great match but once again with no help from WWE creative.
The stupid thing about this is that the championship matches are going to be great. Jericho/Punk will be a great wrestling match and Sheamus/Bryan will be a fitting reward for two hard workers. Firstly, Jericho’s return has been completely screwed up by WWE creative: he doesn’t win the rumble, doesn’t win the elimination chamber and just seems like a whinging has been. If this was their aim then kudos but one can’t help but think they held off on giving Jericho the title too long and now his return seems unimportant and pointless. His match with Punk will be great because those two can wrestle the house down and hopefully they can show the powers that be what WWE should be about. As for Bryan/Sheamus, Bryan’s heel turn has been awesome and he will go into WM28 as champion much to most people’s surprise. Sheamus’ build has been pointless and slow: he wins the rumble and hasn’t had a real feud to keep him busy apart from routinely burying Mark Henry. Bryan win or lose at WM has had a longer and better run than many suspected. He has proved that smaller guys can carry the belt and I suspect AJ might help him retain the belt.
Mesmerising

My knowledge of Marilyn Monroe prior to My Week with Marilyn was pitifully limited to an Elton John song used in a McDonalds’ commercial. She was the candle in the wind: used up and spat out by Hollywood and eternally misunderstood. While my knowledge of Marilyn hasn’t increased much, apart from her marriage to Arthur Miller, I do have a new found interest in her career.
Michelle Williams plays the lead as Marilyn Monroe with Eddie Redmayne as her infatuated rich kid Colin Clark. The movie is based on the real Colin Clark’s memoirs of his experience as he worked with Monroe and Sir Laurence Olivier (superbly played by Kenneth Branagh) on the set of the film The Sleeping Prince. Colin becomes Marilyn’s emotional support on the set as the tumultuous filming occurs with him eventually succumbing to her charms and ending up broken hearted.
The challenge for film makers was always to make Williams the star and as mesmerising as the real Monroe was on film. As far as this goes, they succeeded handsomely with Williams dominating every scene she is in and capturing the spirit of Monroe in one of the best biopic portrayals in recent times. Her charisma is well balanced with her fragility and always with a dash of sexual allure. Branagh is also excellent as the aging star Sir Lawrence Olivier. His crotchety demeanour is slowly revealed to be sheer terror as he sees his career slowly fading away and this provides a stark contrast to the short life we know Monroe experienced.
The one disappointment was the geriatric cast and performance of Redmayne. To the latter, I know he was meant to be naive and young but he was just plain annoying. His puppy dog eyes and inane promises capture the public’s infatuation with Marilyn but ultimately make him a pain to watch. Moreover, the who’s who of British actors who fill the bit parts was equally dismal. Dame Judy Dench’s small role is thankfully limited while the rest of the cast aren’t really worth mentioning. On reflection, this may be a result of Williams’ star shining so bright but having lesser lights in these roles would have made this less obvious.
As biopic film features go this was one of the best recent attempts. While our narrator is an annoying, rich, twat, Williams shines as Monroe and delivers a mesmerising and ravishing performance that was worthy of an Oscar.Sunday, January 29, 2012
Royal Rumble 2012 - A Ginger Surprise

World Heavyweight Champion Daniel Bryan def. Big Show and Mark Henry (Triple Threat Steel Cage Match)
The big question coming into this match was whether Daniel Bryan would be given a longer run with the title or whether Mark Henry would take the strap. The steel cage stipulation made me favour the former and I was pleasantly surprised that Bryan once again escaped with the title. Show and Henry did a good job of beating up Bryan while he attempted to escape any chance he got. The finish was clever with Show unable to prevent Bryan from dropping to the floor. The one disappointment was the lack of action by Henry, who still might be injured, as Show was the only one that hit any convincing offense.
John Cena Promo
Didn’t we realise that Cena was such a caring and compassionate superstar? Or did we need to be reminded how passionate he is about wrestling? Either way, it was well put together and played well to Cena fans.
Divas Champion Beth Phoenix, Natalya & The Bella Twins def. Eve, Kelly Kelly, Alicia Fox & Tamina
My question about this match was: why waste time on this when the world heavyweight championship match could have gone for longer? Booker T calling the fight a “Diva-brook” was the best part of the match as the Kelly Kelly top rope dive was clearly telegraphed and wasn’t even very athletic. With Kharma returning in the rumble match, Beth destroying Kelly Kelly at the end set up Kharma as the next challenger but apart from that not much here.
John Cena vs. Kane (Double Count Out)
I’m surprised Cena used Benoit’s finisher the Crippler Crossface submission in this match that was pedestrian from both superstars. Kane choked and beat up Cena before inexplicably stopping just as he went to super-plex Cena from the top rope thus leading to the Cena come back. They then fought outside the ring to a double count-out and through to the back. Kane then attacked broken back (no sorry, just herniated disc) Zack Ryder and brought him back to the ring. He then destroyed Zack with a tombstone and Cena with a choke slam. It sets up the two for a match next pay-per-view but hopefully they can do more in ring and not rely on post-match antics to save them.
The Rock Promo
This promo was meant to show that the Rock was both a movie star and wrestler: cue copious gym work and shots of his toned upper body. He harped on about never really leaving the WWE and shining bright at Wrestlemania – yawn.
Brodus Clay def. Drew McIntyre
I read on a IWC post speculating about how they would work the Funkosaurus’ dance into the show and this was it. Clay squashed McIntyre after about 1 minute of offense and just kept dancing. The only surprise was that William Regal didn’t make an appearance to promote the feud.
WWE Champion CM Punk def. Dolph Ziggler (Special Guest Referee John Laurinaitis)
This was the best non-rumble match of the night. Johnny put himself outside the ring to seem impartial and even evicted Vicky as per the match on RAW a few weeks ago. Ziggler once again looked like main event material in this match with some of his offense but never seriously looked like he might pull out the win. The end was well booked with a ref bump and Johnny costing Punk the win after the anaconda vise, a roll up and a couple of GTSs, especially when Punk called Johnny “clown shoes”. Johnny then helped the ref with the 3 count after Punk kicked out of a zig zag and hit a final GTS. [Funnily, this is an almost identical end to the HBK vs British Bulldog WWE championship match with Mr Perfect as special guest referee at the King of the Ring pay-per-view in 1996.] Punk celebrated the win and Johnny just walked away.
Sheamus won the 30-Man Royal Rumble Match
With all the press surrounding Miz and him entering #1, the first half of rumble match was him and Cody Rhodes beating up clear non-winners. Some of the funnier moments were: Ricardo Rodriguez coming out as Del Rio; Mr Socko (Foley) vs. The Cobra (Santino); all the announcers entering the rumble; Kofi Kingston handstand walking back to the ring; and the return of Kharma. By the time Road Dogg came out, it looked like Miz might go all the way but when Show came in at #30, he cleared house and put an end to that. The final four had Show, Orton, Jericho and Sheamus squaring off. After a thunderous RKO to Show, Orton eliminated Show and was promptly up ended by Jericho. Jericho and Sheamus had some near wins but eventually a Brogue kick saw Jericho enter and leave at #29.
The interesting thing about this outcome is that it seems to contradict many predictions about Wrestlemania. Most IWC commentators had either Jericho winning and facing Punk at Wrestlemania or Orton winning in his home town and facing Bryan at Wrestlemania. This might be a deliberate swerve by WWE as it seems that one of those outcomes is now scuttled. They might have Sheamus putting his title opportunity on the line like Mysterio did against Orton but that would seem illogical and Sheamus has worked hard to earn his Wrestlemania moment. Other options could be: Jericho is no longer going to headline Wrestlemania (maybe he could win the Money in the Bank match which he created and get the title of Punk like that) or Orton might need more time off after his back injury. Either way, it was refreshing to see Sheamus win despite Jericho yet to win a rumble in his storied career and he will be good at Wrestlemania.
Overall this was one of the better pay-per-views in the past year or so. The rumble was fun because it was shorter, had some fun story lines and a serious end. Punk retained the title with Johnny Ace calling it straight in a strong match for Ziggler while Bryan retained the title in a match that reinforces his strong run with the title at the moment. Kane/Cena was predictably poor in terms of wrestling but continued the story line coherently and logically. The other matches were typical filler material. As usual, WWE has its thinking caps on leading up to Wrestlemania: may it continue up to Florida and beyond.
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Go see it for the Dog!

Young Adult
The tag line for this ‘comedy’ is: “Everyone gets old. Not everyone grows up.” It neatly sums up this Jason Reitman film but it is also the film’s weakness: the characters may not have grown up but the audience has.
This is not the first outing for the duo of Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody. The two combined successfully to create the comedy Juno that tackled the issue of teen pregnancy and not growing up too quickly. More recently he directed current Oscar favourite George Clooney in the adult romance Up in the Air. While both these films are fun and engaging, watching them back on DVD I started questioning why I had enjoyed them so much to start with. The problem was the pacing: at the cinema, hostage to my $15 ticket and captive in my seat, I was willing to ride out some boredom for a decent film. In the comfort of my own home I just wanted to hit fast forward. Unfortunately, this time I was hostage to my $15 ticket and in a packed cinema: with Young Adult there was no escape!
Young Adult is about ghost writer Mavis Gary, played by perennial Oscar favourite Charlize Theron. Mavis is an alcoholic, Diet Coke guzzling, reality TV junky, struggling to finish the last of an increasingly unpopular series of Young Adult (YA) novels. Upon receiving an email from an ex-boyfriend, she decides to return home and try and win him back. Already the shallowness of the plot was starting to worry me: at least Juno had a baby and was experiencing real problems. Instead, we follow Mavis as she checks into a hotel with dog in tow and goes about winning back her high school boyfriend from his wife and newly born baby.
For the next hour and a half the audience is subjected to the shameless flirting of Mavis that is both pathetic and lacks any of the promised comedy. In fact, the dog doesn’t have any lines but elicited more laughs in the cinema than any of the characters. Moreover, the plot fails to develop past these threadbare premises until right on cue, the third act begins with the obvious message of the film in the clichéd drunken excursion to the woods: you need to move on from the past and grow up.
And this is the heart of this film’s failure: Diablo Cody forgot that the audience of Young Adult were in fact adults and that they could handle something a little more complicated. One of the reviews claims this is “Juno’s wicked older sister” but at least Juno had something important to say about life, whereas Mavis only exists between alcohol fuelled day dreams of high school romance. Moreover, she is encouraged in these hedonistic and apathetic pursuits by one of the minor character who states that the small town folk are “nothing” and that “they may as well die” thus absolving her of guilt for wanting to wreck a happy marriage and validating her empty life.
I don’t know what happened in the script writing process that this occurred or whether Reitman just couldn’t be bothered bringing some sense to this story. The entire film instead validates the existence of the small town folk as fulfilled and enjoying their lives while the big city star is the one who wants for rewarding relationships and purpose. Then maybe again I’m reading too much into the film. Or perhaps that was the point all along and I was too annoyed at wasting my money on it to see that. Either way, someone screwed the pooch on this one.

